Sunday, April 10, 2016

Production Report Project 3A

Once again it is time for production.  This time was more traditional in that I am writing a standard college essay.  In this post I will show segments from my content outline and then show the content I produced for said segment.

Outline Item

  1. iIntroduction

  1. Attention Grabber
Introduce the importance of the topic by talking about how the presidential elections can influence the country for years to come.  Also talk about how the mainstream media has had an agenda against Donald Trump.

    B.  Background
  • Going off of the attention grabber, explain in more detail how Trump is wrongly treated by the media.
  • Acknowledge the polarizing nature of Trump, and ask the reader to hear out what my argument is about because it could be eye-opening.

    C.  Thesis
Donald Trump is a legitimate presidential candidate that everyone should at least consider, in this paper I will dispel the myths that Trump is racist, misogynist, and homophobic by exploring his stances on immigration as well as actions he has made in the past.

Adaption of Outline Item

It is a leap year, and as such, America is preparing for the 2016 presidential elections.  Presidential elections are an important aspect to America’s democratic society, and the results from them can influence the entire country for years to come.  Among the frontrunning candidates to the presidential office is one standout:  Donald J. Trump.  Trump is a polarizing figure to many people, and tends to draw a lot of emotionally charged criticism and hatred.  Many consider Trump to be a bigot, a misogynist, and a homophobe, you name it.  This in part due to the treatment Trump gets from the mainstream media, who have seemed to have an agenda against Trump in order to paint him in a negative light thus far in the election season.  However, this paper will dispel the common accusations against Trump and talk about why Trump would make a good president by specifically looking at his stances on immigration and national security.


  1. How did you decide to use form to present your content in the raw material you’ve shared here? How did the conventions of your chosen genre influence your choices?

Like I said at the beginning of this blog post, I am writing in a standard college essay for this project, so there wasn't really much to think about in terms of form and genre conventions besides making my content professional.

  1. How did the production of this raw material go? What kinds of any hiccups, challenges, successes, creative epiphanies, etc. occurred during the process?

There wasn't really any major issues with production. The thing about my intro was making sure that my thesis was concise and specific enough in order to write a well-focused essay about it.

Sunday, April 3, 2016

Project 3 Peer Review B

For the second peer review, I decided to review Avalon Lubera's content outline which is about drug decriminalization to help the prison population problem.

The content outline is overall good, Avalon provides evidence and analysis for each body paragraph at an adequate level and provides concise sentences that get the point across.  I also liked that Avalon had a paragraph dedicated to rebutting the other side to her argument.  Avalon has a clear grasp on the requirements for project 3, and has chosen a clear, specific, and controversial topic to argue about.

One of the main issues with the outline is that their are not specific sources cited.  Providing the sources in the outline can help with organization and fluidity when creating the actual content of the project.  Besides that, it would probably be helpful to provide more analysis of the evidence that is provided.  For instance, the majority of the time there is only one small quip in response to the evidence that is given, which is not nearly enough.  However, it is only an outline that is just supposed to get the basic ideas down.

Besides that, the outline is well made and would certainly be helpful for Avalon when she begins to create her project.

Project 3 Peer Review A

For this peer review I reviewed Rashaan Malik's rhetorical analysis which is about his rhetorical situation for his topic of the 2020 FIFA World Cup controversies.

Overall, Rashaan's rhetorical analysis is well done, and provides a lot of detail in answering the questions that someone might have about his project.  He does a good job of explaining information about him, his purpose, audience, and context through clear sentences that directly answer the questions that a reader may have.

Rashaan understands the goal of project 3, but I feel like he wants to be as nice as possible when he doesn't have to be.  For instance, for his purpose, Rashaan says he wants "the audience to consider the malevolent nature of corporations..."  I believe for the sake of an argument, his goal should be to have his audience understand and accept the things he wanted them to consider, as that should be the goal of an argument, to get people on your side.

Another concern I have is that while Rashaan is arguing about a controversial topic, I feel as though the majority of his audience would already be in favor of the positions he is going to argue for, which defeats the purpose.  I may however be wrong about the general opinion of his topic, but I would recommend that he argues for something that is polarizing in itself.

I liked that Rashaan knows he must consider qualifying arguments and take other perspectives into account which I did not think that much about during my pre-production phase.  For my revision, I identified specific problems and provided suggestions.

Project 3 Reflection on Pre-Production

What were some of the successes (or, things that went right) during this week’s process work? Explain, with evidence.

What went right was that I was able to gather a good amount of sources that will be really helpful during the production week.  Furthermore, I was able to find a topic that I actually have an interest in and I can talk about it with passion.

What were some of the challenges (or, things that went wrong) during this week’s process work? Explain, with evidence.

One of the challenges was that there was a lot of busy work to sludge through (listing sources/rhetorical analysis) that I felt took up way too much time for how helpful they actually are.

How do you think next week will go, based on your experiences this week?

Next week should go well as I am writing an essay, which I have a lot of experience in, and I have a lot of the information I will need.

How are you feeling about the project overall at this point?

I am feeling strong about the project, I just have some concern over whether or not my topic is specific enough, but the project prompt doesn't really clarify how specific it needs to be.

Production Schedule Project 3

With the production week coming up for Project 3 coming up, it would be helpful to make a schedule for what needs to be done over the week.

Monday April 4th
Begin Rough Draft, finish introduction paragraph.

Wednesday April 6th
Finish Body Paragraph 1

Thursday April 7th
Continue with draft, finish 2nd body paragraph.

Friday April 8th
Continue with draft, finish 3rd body paragraph.

Saturday April 9th
Finish draft.

Sunday April 10th
Revise and Edit draft #1

Wednesday April 13th
Revise and Edit draft #2

Saturday April 16th
Go over and finalize essay

The locations for these dates will be at the University of Arizona on my laptop.  The only things I will need are my laptop and an internet connection.

Content Outline Project 3

This is my project outline for Project 3.  The genre I am doing is a standard college essay.

LINK to outline

Research Report

After gathering sources for Project 3, it is time to share my sources and provide insight on their rhetorical situations.

Source 1 

"Donald Trump, a champion of women? His female employees think so."
by Frances Stead Sellers
via The Washington Post

About the author:  Frances Sellers is a senior writer at the Washington Post, and has previously won a National Magazine award for launching a bi-monthly magazine for the Library of Congress.  Sellers primary job at the moment is covering the 2016 election for the Post, which givers her credibility in regards to her coverage of the elections.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people who believe that Trump is a misogynist and an enemy of women.  This can be seen from the title, which clearly debunks the theory that Trump is a misogynist by saying that women who know him think he is great.  Furthermore, the entire are article are anecdotes form former female employees of Trump who hold him in high regard.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to illustrate the opinions that former female employees have for Trump.  This can be seen from the title, which is an overall synopsis of the article's contents, as well as in the article itself, which is filled with positive anecdotal evidence about Trump concerning women.

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from The Washington Post, which is the most widely circulated paper in the Washington D.C. area and is nationally known.  Furthermore, the credentials of the author tell me that this article is most likely reliable.


2

"Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings"
by David Wright
via CNN

About the author:  David Wright is a writer for CNN who is covering the 2016 election as a breaking news reporter.  Wright has a degree in politics and has worked for CNN in their Washington D.C. Bureau.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people who dislike Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton and are more in favor of Bernie Sanders.  This can be seen from the title of the piece which implies that the article is negative towards Trump and Clinton.  Furthermore, the article is full of negative information about Trump and Clinton while saying that Bernie Sanders is a much more favorable candidate.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to illustrate and amplify negativity towards Trump and Clinton.  This can be seen from the way David Wright worded his presentation of the information, "That makes Trump and Clinton viewed more unfavorably than any front-runner for either party since 1984."  Furthermore, the author seems to be in favor of Sanders as he talks about how Sanders would do better against Trump than Clinton, even though Sanders isn't even ahead of Clinton.

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from CNN, a nationally acknowledged news source.  Furthermore, the article uses polling data from CBS/New York Times, two other well known news outlets.

3

"Trump: Same-Sex Marriage Is a Dead Issue"
by Bil Browning
via The Advocate

About the author:  Bil Browning is a writer for the Advocate.  Browning is a champion for LGBT writes, so the fact that he has a positive article about Trump is eye-opening as Trump is seen as anti-LGBT by a lot of people.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people who believe Donald Trump is anti-LGBT as well as people who are in favor of LGBT rights.  This is because Trump is generally seen as anti-LGBT, and this article disproves that.  Furthermore, The Advocate is a LGBT-interest magazine, so most of its articles are about LGBT rights.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to show that Trump is not as anti-LGBT as a lot of people make him out to me, and he does not believe gay-marriage is an issue.  Additionally, the article seems to want to show that Trump is the best Republican candidate from when Browning states, "Other presidential candidates in the crowded Republican field have called for a constitutional amendment to overturn the June Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States."

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from The Advocate, which is a magazine dedicated to LGBT news, and the article is about Trump's stance on an LGBT issue.  Furthermore, the article is simply reporting a quote that Trump said from an interview, so their is raw information that can't be misconstrued.

4

"Illegal Alien Crime Wave in Texas: 611,234 Crimes, 2,993 Murders"
by J. Christian Adams
via PJ Media

About the author:  Adams is an election lawyer who has worked in the U.S. Department of Justice.  Adams also has written a New York Times Bestselling book.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people who lean on the right side of the U.S. political spectrum, (conservatives, libertarians),  This can be seen because the article is anti illegal immigration/illegal aliens, as the article is a hit piece illustrating the problems that illegal immigrants have caused.  Furthermore, PJ Media is a conservative based news outlet.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to show that the damages that illegal immigrants have caused, and thus is advocating for border control/illegal immigration control.  The title itself illustrates the article's negative views on illegal immigration as the title itself refers to illegal immigrants as "aliens," a politically incorrect slur.

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from a well known news site (PJ Media).  Furthermore, the article is filled with links to its sources which provides credibility in terms of its information.

5

"Hungarian Border Fence So Effective Illegal Immigrants Are Now At Pre Migrant-Crisis Levels"
by Oliver JJ Lane
via Breitbart

About the author:  Oliver Lane is a writer for Breitbart London and reports on national defense, security, and radical Islam.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people who lean conservative or people who are in favor of or unsure of building a wall on a country's border.  This is because Breitbart is a conservative news outlet, and the article is providing news on the effects of a border fence at stopping illegal immigration.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to show that the building a border fence/wall is an effective way to deter illegal immigrants.  The article provides facts showing how Illegal Immigration has gotten better for Hungary after they put up a border fence.  A good quote from the article that illustrates its overall purpose is:  "strong borders and a strong defence were key to a nation’s prosperity."

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from a credible news site (Breitbart.com) and provides links to its sources for the information that it is providing.


6

"Trump denounces David Duke, KKK"
by Eugene Scott
via CNN

About the author:  Eugene Scott is a reporter for CNN Politics and is covering the 2016 elections for them.  Scott is also "a multiple award-winning journalist, recognized by the National Association of Black Journalists, the Society of Professional Journalists and Gannett Awards of Excellence, for his work related to politics, education and urban policy issues."

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people interested in the 2016 presidential candidates, particularly those interested in Donald Trump.  The article is dedicated to Trump information, and gives information on the overall election landscape on the Republican side.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to show that Donald Trump has disavowed David Duke, which was a concern for many when he would previously not comment on the matter.  The title of the article clearly shows what the article is going to be about.  Furthermore, the article seems to sympathize with Trump by giving a quote from Trump: "I'm not being treated the right way. I'm not being treated properly."

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from CNN, and provides video proof of what is being talked about.

7

"Is Donald Trump 2016’s most LGBT-friendly Republican?"
by Emma Margolin
via MSNBC

About the author:  Emma Margolin is a reporter for MSNBC, and her primary areas of expertise are in LGBT, equality, and society.  Her work has been published in the Princeton Journal of Bioethics.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be liberals/independents as well as people interested in LGBT rights.  MSNBC is a liberal leaning news outlet, and the article is about which Republican candidate is the most LGBT friendly.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to talk about the Republican presidential candidates in terms of their views on the LGBT community.  The article does focus on Trump, as he is seen as the most LGBT-friendly Republican candidate.  The article isn't fully pro-Trump, but it clearly supports Trump more than the other candidates.  "Yet none of those candidates could ever be described as “pro-LGBT” – certainly not, at least, more so than Trump."

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from MSNBC which is a nationally accredited news outlet.  Furthermore, the article comes out with quotes and facts and gives its own sources as well.

8

"Attorney: Trump Companies Employ More Female Execs Than Male"
by Chuck Ross
via MSNBC

About the author:  Chuck Ross is a reporter at The Daily Caller and has published numerous articles about political topics.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be conservatives as well as Trump supporters/haters.  The Daily Caller is a conservative news outlet, and the article is centered around Trump, whom is very controversial and has a good amount of people who dislike and like him.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this article is to disprove the idea that Trump is a misogynist by providing facts demonstrating how he is more than fair towards women (at least in the work force).  The article is about Trump's fairness to his women employees,  "Trump has maintained that he “cherishes” women and that he has long been progressive on the issue of employing women at the top levels of his companies."


Context: This source is reliable because it comes from a reliable and accredited news outlet in The Daily Caller.  Furthermore, the article provides sources and facts to prove that what it is talking about is truthful.

9

"Donal Trump:  Positions"
by Donald Trump
via DonaldJTrump.com

About the author:  This source comes from Donald Trump's website, so it was directly written by him or one of his campaign workers.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people interested in Trump's political positions, and since he is running on the Republican ballot, Republicans/Independents would be his primary target.  I feel as though this source is also targeting Trump haters, as a good majority of them do not actually know Trump's policy positions.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this source is to clearly illustrate Trump's positions on several issues.  The source simply states a number of issues, then provides Trump's positions on them.  There really isn't much to it, all presidential candidates have a page like this on their websites, and they are intended to inform the public on where they stand.

Context: This source is reliable because it comes straight from the Donald himself.  Since it is the official page of his campaign, it can be assumed that the information is credible.


10

"Donald Trump's proposed ban on Muslim immigrants could be legal, scholars say"
by David Savage
via The LA Times

About the author:  "David G. Savage has covered the Supreme Court and legal issues for the Los Angeles Times in the Washington bureau since 1986."  He has also been writing for the LA Times since 1981.

Target Audience: The intended audience for this article would be people interested about Trump's comments regarding stopping Muslims from entering the United States.  The article discusses the legality of the issue and provides commentary on the morality of the issue as well.

Purpose:  The main purpose for this source is to talk about the legality and morality of Trump's plan to ban Muslims from entering the United States for a period of time.  The article talks about what scholars have concluded about the plan, and also provides insight on what people think about the plan.

Context: This source is reliable because it comes from a major newspaper in the LA Times.  Furthermore, the article provides its sources and comes from an esteemed author/reporter.